Stanford Health Care and Sutter Health have signed a letter of motive to explore possibilities to collectively offer cancer care for patients and their families in the East Bay place of the San Francisco/Oakland metropolitan region. The cause of the collaboration is to increase access to first-rate cancer care for sufferers as near domestic as possible using constructing at the energy of Stanford’s leadership in cancer care and scientific research, the Stanford Medicine network and Sutter’s integrated network.
Here are 5 matters to realize about the joint cancer care effort:
1. The new East Bay oncology collaboration would help nearby patients simplify care coordination, lessen journey time and recognition on remedy and healing.
2. Initial sports between the 2 entities will receive recognition on approaches to build upon contemporary and developing cancer-related services and care settings already in a location inside the organizations’ respective networks. Also, the collaboration will joint efforts to increase get right of entry to cancer clinical trials and to make other improvements to preference and excellent of taking care of East Bay patients and their families.
3. Joint discussions additionally include potential plans to broaden an integrated, multidisciplinary most cancers centre in the East Bay, modelled on the pretty successful Stanford Cancer Center South Bay idea. The planned outpatient most cancers centre might serve as a neighbourhood hub for most cancers care and provide East Bay patients. Their households get right of entry to to the most superior, entire and coordinated care from screening thru survivorship.
4. A collaboration between Stanford and Sutter Health would greatly improve get an entry for East Bay cancer sufferers to new possibilities for clinical care and clinical studies, which includes an expanded array of medical trials.
5. The possibility will significantly enhance their shared commitment to health equity using enhancing access to exceptional take care of underrepresented minorities in the network who often lack access to superior care alternatives and the capability to take part in clinical trials.
“With this new collaboration, Stanford Health Care goals to carry the total supplement of its international-magnificence most cancers prevention, remedy, and scientific studies applications to serve sufferers within the East Bay,” stated David Entwistle, president, and CEO of Stanford Health Care. “Partnering with Sutter Health, with its properly-hooked up, high-quality most cancers software within the region is the ideal possibility, and we are thrilled to move forward with them on this attempt.”
“As an incorporated community, Sutter Health has proudly supplied reachable, extraordinary care to our sufferers throughout the East Bay for over a century, and we’re excited to construct on this legacy,” stated Sarah Krevans, president and CEO of Sutter Health. “This declaration is an example of Sutter and Stanford’s shared commitment as now not-for-profit fitness systems to offer pleasant, compassionate and handy care, and to accomplish that in a way that can provide the fine effects for our sufferers and our community.
There are many health services, and a proper range of health care services needs to be provided under a proper healthcare system. The United States does not have the best health care services in the world, but it can be said that it has the best emergency care system around the globe. The fact behind this is that America is having the highest level of poverty and income inequality among all the rich and developed nations, and it affects the reach of the people to the proper health services.
Health systems are designed to fulfil the needs of the health care of some targeted nation or population. Health care planning and its proper system implementation are much more necessary for any country or government. According to the World health report, 2000 “Improving performance is good health, responsiveness to the expectations of the population, and fair financial contribution.” Duckett (2004) proposed a two-dimensional approach to the evaluation of health systems: “quality, efficiency, and acceptability on one dimension and equity on another.”
